Guest Editorial
If you read CUCollector, which is an excellent forum for information and accuracy for the collateral recovery industry and the lending community you probably read the recent article regarding a lawsuit filed in federal court under the FDCPA by Wanda Vantu v. Echo Recovery, LLC, et al. This article has stimulated lots of discussion, the primary reason being that many in the collateral recovery industry as well as some lenders seem surprised that a Section of the FDCPA specifically applies to collateral recovery agents (Security Enforcers as defined by the Federal Trade Commission). I would like to follow up on the CUCollector article because, due to the proliferation of Wrongful Repossession lawsuits being litigated in federal courts I believe this is a subject that warrants further discussion and clarification.
Read More!
More Stories
Every Recovery Agency Is Also a Lender
The Repossession Merry-Go-Round
Repo Agent vs. Repo Agent – The Battles in the Field
The Forwarding Generation and the Value of a Box of Donuts
When Fear Turns Violent: Understanding the Psychology Behind Repossession Confrontations
Bridgecrest’s Fuel Surcharge Program a Step Forward—But Is It Enough for California?