Guest Editorial
If you read CUCollector, which is an excellent forum for information and accuracy for the collateral recovery industry and the lending community you probably read the recent article regarding a lawsuit filed in federal court under the FDCPA by Wanda Vantu v. Echo Recovery, LLC, et al. This article has stimulated lots of discussion, the primary reason being that many in the collateral recovery industry as well as some lenders seem surprised that a Section of the FDCPA specifically applies to collateral recovery agents (Security Enforcers as defined by the Federal Trade Commission). I would like to follow up on the CUCollector article because, due to the proliferation of Wrongful Repossession lawsuits being litigated in federal courts I believe this is a subject that warrants further discussion and clarification.
Read More!
More Stories
WHEN IS ENOUGH, ENOUGH? A Question Worth Asking Across the Repossession Industry
Three Million Repossessions: A New Measure of America’s Recovery Industry
Why Fight LPR? Join It — But What Happens When the Car Repossesses Itself?
In The Future Will There Be Anyone Left to Recover Vehicles?
The Broken Bond Between Lenders and Agents – Positive Resolution
The Repos That May Never Come