We are inviting lenders, forwarders, repossession agencies, vendors, and recovery professionals to share candid feedback regarding the role, coverage, credibility, and direction of CUCollector.com and CURepossession.com. – Take Our Poll!
Last week, we published an article examining the evolving affiliate and data-sharing models within the LPR ecosystem and invited industry feedback through a series of open surveys. The response was significant. On social media, some readers supported the discussion. Others strongly disagreed. But one point raised during the conversations afterward stood out:
If the repossession and lending industries are willing to openly discuss vendors, platforms, forwarders, compliance pressures, and technology providers, should industry publications like CUCollector and CURepossession themselves also be open to feedback?
That is a fair question.
A Fair Comparison
The DRN poll’s article makes prominent mention of their 17 year history. Coincidental, CUCollector turns 17 in July and CURepossession turns 8 later this summer as well. Since then, it has evolved from small industry news projects into two of the most widely read independent media platforms serving the collections, lending, forwarding, repossession, and recovery industries.
Along the way, the platforms have covered controversial subjects many others avoided:
- lender and forwarder fee pressure,
- breach-of-peace litigation,
- violence against agents,
- compliance failures,
- transporter fraud,
- LPR controversies,
- repo reality television culture,
- vendor disputes,
- legal actions,
- regulatory shifts,
- and operational pressures facing both lenders and field agents.
Obviously, not everyone has agreed with every article, editorial, poll, or opinion piece published over the years, and that is especially expected in an industry as fragmented and emotionally charged as repossession and collections.
But independent media only remains relevant if it continues listening to the people actually working in the industry.
So this time, the focus shifts inward.
Key Questions for Industry Consideration
We are asking readers, lenders, repossession agencies, forwarders, attorneys, vendors, compliance professionals, and recovery agents to provide honest feedback regarding both platforms, their coverage, credibility, usefulness, tone, and direction moving forward.
The surveys below are not scientific polling. They are simply intended to provide a broad temperature check of industry sentiment and create an outlet for constructive feedback, be it positive or negative.
Industry Feedback Survey – CURepossession.com
Polls Close Wednesday May the 27th
So, Swing Away!
Feedback Matters
The repossession industry is changing rapidly.
Technology is reshaping skip tracing and assignment flow. Compliance pressures continue increasing. Margins remain tight. Litigation exposure continues growing. Consolidation is accelerating across lenders, vendors, and service providers. Public perception challenges remain significant.
At the same time, being an independent industry media faces its own challenges: balancing transparency without fueling unnecessary division, covering controversy without becoming consumed by it, and giving professionals a voice while still maintaining editorial independence.
That balancing act is not always easy.
But feedback matters.
Whether supportive or critical, constructive industry input helps shape the direction of future reporting, editorials, investigations, and coverage priorities.
We invite readers from all sides of the industry to participate respectfully and honestly.
Kevin Armstrong
Publisher





More Stories
The Liability No One Can Contract Away
The Repo Squeeze: Why Recovery Companies Are Being Pressured from Every Direction
Evolution of the DRN “Affiliate” Model – Request for Industry Feedback
Transport Fraud Pressure Begins Shifting Toward Repossession Agencies
Repossession vs. Remarketing: A Breakdown in Accountability
The Tale of the Orchard of Apples and Oranges