In our two prior CUCollector Surveys, LPR was one of only several topics we covered, but as the result of some discussion coupled with demand, we felt that we were well overdue in approaching this topic in a more focused manner and drilling down on it a little deeper than in years past. The accompanying data is inclusive of previous years and while disparities in poll volume vary from the years, the percentages are the best methodology for illustrating the data results.
While responses to polls tend to lean toward the negativity you would expect in a “Yelp” review, I would like to think that this years responses are perhaps more fairly balanced despite some clear underlying pessimism within.





More Stories
When the Watchdog Leaves: What a Smaller CFPB Could Mean for Repossession
The Conversation the Repossession Industry Has Avoided for 45 Years
The Blind Spot Closes – Forwarding Intermediary Liability After Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II
The Evolution of CUCollector and CURepossession: Request for Industry Feedback
The Liability No One Can Contract Away
The Repo Squeeze: Why Recovery Companies Are Being Pressured from Every Direction